Skip to content
Teaching the Holocaust and other Genocides

Euthanasia: Maria "Kätchen" Reichardt

Early Life

Maria Katharina Reichardt, known in her family as Kätchen, was born December 15, 1911, to a middle-class family in Posen (now Poznan, Poland). She was four years younger than her sister Hildegard, called Hilla. Their father, Willy Reichardt, was a captain and battery commander in the Prussian army. Their mother, Elisabeth or Ella, always called "Omi" by later generations, was a mother and housewife. The family lived a well-established life in Posen.

Reichardt Family

Reichardt Family, c. World War I

In 1917, during World War I, Willy was killed in action in France at only 44 years old, leaving Omi a widow and single mother with two daughters. As a result, she moved back to her native city of Berlin, where her father was still living. She found a reasonable rental apartment in an affluent neighborhood near Charlottenburg Palace. Hilla attended high school, but Kätchen stayed home because she was often too ill to attend. She was taught at home by a teacher from the auxiliary school from fall of 1921 to spring of 1923. Kätchen could read and write a little, but was unable to complete math tasks.

Hilla and Katchen Reichardt

Kätchen and Hilla, 1923

According to family oral history, besides regular severe colds, tonsillitis, stomach and intestinal disorders, Kätchen had seizures every once in a while, and in later years was eventually diagnosed with epilepsy. One morning in January 1924, her legs gave out and she screamed in pain. The doctor suspected rheumatoid arthritis, but later came to the conclusion that it was paralysis. She also developed temporary paralysis of her hands, legs, feet, and bladder.

After each serious illness, her mental development regressed. Kätchen had contracted encephalitis at the age of one year and three months and family members attribute later developmental delays and difficulties to this early childhood illness.

In July 1924, Kätchen’s recurring tonsillitis made it necessary to remove her tonsils and the growths behind them. After the light anesthesia, she experienced temporary irritation of the meninges and seizures occurred again. At the beginning of October, she experienced a week of paralysis of the bladder, combined with slight paralysis of hands and feet. Gradually, she recovered and was physically healthy for three months with the exception of frequent insomnia, which became more and more severe in the last few years in times of severe illnesses and shortly after. 

As a result, Omi started looking for an institution where Kätchen could be taken care of. She visited the Sanatorium and Nursing Home Marsberg, which was run by catholic nuns, and decided to apply for admission of her daughter to the sanatorium out of two main reasons: because it was a catholic institution and because some relatives would not be far away. As she  believed that it would be the best place for her child, Kätchen moved to State Sanatorium and Nursing Home Marsberg (St. Johannes-Stift Niedermarsberg) for medical care at age 13.

Excerpt: Letter from Ella to Sanatorium

After a bronchial catarrh in February 1925, we noticed a great change in the child's character. She suddenly suffered from obsessions, fits of rage and screaming. She could hardly be kept at home for 2 months.   She then became calmer again thanks to tranquilizers (Zuminal) and other measures. I was solely responsible for the care of the child during the last two difficult years. My health was so shattered that the doctor strongly wished to have the child admitted to an institution.

When Kätchen was admitted to St. Johannes-Stift Niedermarsberg on July 24, 1925, the facility had: “... 470 beds and specialist departments for acute psychiatric treatment and psychosomatics: discharge preparation; clinical central and neuropediatric treatment; medium-long-term treatment (learning and mentally handicapped), and medium-long-term treatment (multiple handicapped). The hospital area includes extensive facilities for occupational work and occupational therapy for vocational promotion and rehabilitation, including appropriate craft workshops and a well-equipped social center.”

Entry and Exit Book from St-Johanees Stift Niedermarsberg

Entry and exit book St-Johannes Stift Niedermarsberg

Kätchen’s physical and mental health went up and down during her time in the sanatorium, as the family had learned from the medical history record in her file. An entry from April 21, 1926, stated, “Makes an extraordinarily pleased and happy impression, quite lively, is also becoming more confident in her movements. Speaks more, shows quite good appetite. Has been keeping herself clean lately.” However, on the first of January 1927, an entry stated, “Goes back mentally. No progress, still not reporting her needs” and on May 20, 1927, “Lives dully. Hardly speaks at all. Smiles stupidly when spoken to. Occasionally unclean.”

1925 Entries from the Medical Record at St-Johannes Stift Niedermarsberg

  • August 12, 1925: “Has settled in very well, doesn't want to go back home, wants to stay here. … Still unclean, does not express her needs at all. Sometimes snotty, often makes a stubborn impression. Often doesn't answer questions, just laughs quietly to herself. … Twists her hair. Holds herself poorly. Likes to play outside with the other kids! At home usually sits quietly and acts like a stranger."
  • August 26, 1925: “An intelligence test cannot be carried out - at least not yet. The child even fails the simple task of showing body parts such as nose, mouth and eyes, smiles to herself and does not answer other questions. She certainly has a good understanding of language, but verbal contact with the child is not possible.”
  • August 12, 1925: “Has settled in very well, doesn't want to go back home, wants to stay here. … Still unclean, does not express her needs at all. Sometimes snotty, often makes a stubborn impression. Often doesn't answer questions, just laughs quietly to herself. … Twists her hair. Holds herself poorly. Likes to play outside with the other kids! At home usually sits quietly and acts like a stranger.”
  • August 26, 1925: “An intelligence test cannot be carried out - at least not yet. The child even fails the simple task of showing body parts such as nose, mouth and eyes, smiles to herself and does not answer other questions. She certainly has a good understanding of language, but verbal contact with the child is not possible." But during the next month her development was positive as an entry from December 22, 1925 shows: “Becomes livelier and livelier, has been cheerful and lively ever since. Sings and laughs. Now sometimes expresses her needs. Develops favorably in terms of general behavior.”

Then, at the beginning of 1928, she seemed to be again completely changed: “speaks by herself, laughs and plays nicely with the other children.” On August 29, 1933, her mother, Omi took her on a ten-day trip to the city of Trier. An entry under September 9, 1933 stated: “Came back today. Didn't cause any major problems on the trip.” In 1935, it’s mentioned that she had had seizures again and from that time onwards, they occurred about every quarter of a year. In 1936, it was also noted: “Still shows strong mood swings. At times cheerful, friendly, approachable, then again agitated, stubborn, grumpy, absent. Physical condition satisfactory. Weight: 99 pounds.” The most she ever weighed during her time in the sanatorium was 103.6 pounds and the last weight entry from March 1939 shows 94.8 pounds.

These mood swings continued in 1937. There are no entries for 1938, but in March 1939, the following entry was made: “Strong mood swings, sometimes friendly and approachable, sometimes agitated and angry. Is clean, needs to be fed. Communication with her is not possible.” Even though it was quite a distance from Berlin, Omi, her mother, and her sister, Hilla, visited Kätchen regularly in Marsberg.  

Family Members

Bernhard Hartung - Brother-in-Law and Physician 

Visit the Bernhard Hartung page for a more information about Dr. Hartung's story.

Jenny Reichardt - Paternal Aunt

As Kätchen was in Niedermarsberg, her “Aunt Jenny” chose Marsberg as her place of residence after her retirement. Bernhard wrote about her: “An aunt Jenny Reichardt - after her retirement as Lectrice to Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands [in fact she was the lectrice of Emma, Wilhelmina’s mother] - had chosen the town of Niedermarsberg as her retirement home to look after her [Kätchen]. She often visited the child in the institution and supplemented the loving care of the Vincentian Sisters.”

During the family’s research about Kätchen, they found letters from Aunt Jenny to Kätchen in her records and discovered that Kätchen was Aunt Jenny’s beloved niece and that they must have had a very loving relationship. Jenny sent letters and parcels during her work life in the Netherlands and visited her as often as she could. Among others, the family found a Christmas card from Queen Emma for Kätchen from December 1925. The postcard was accompanied by a longer, lovely Christmas letter from Aunt Jenny to her niece. As the family learned from another letter Jenny sent to the sanatorium, she also supported her brother, Willy Reichardt, Kätchen’s father, and her sister-in-law, Kätchen’s mother, Omi, financially during the war and after, especially when Omi was a widow and had to pay the care allowance for the sanatorium by herself.

Postcard from Aunt Jenny to Katchen Front

Transcription: Dear little Käthe I wish you, ...
“Gelukkig Kerstfeest” = Happy Christmas

Postcard from Aunt Jenny to Katchen Back

Transcription: … Aunt Jenny's Queen, a Merry Christmas with the other dear little children and the good sisters, and send you a warm scarf and gloves and a picture book and chocolate which you will certainly enjoy sharing with the other children. 
Emma

The late 1920s and early 1930 were the time of the Great Depression and inflation rose to never seen before heights in Germany. An increase of the care allowance came at a time of very fast rising living costs without an increase in pension or other support. Aunt Jenny was also heavily impacted. The situation in the Netherlands was as dire as in Germany, and she couldn’t support Omi anymore. She explains this in a letter to the director of the Sanatorium, asking him to prevent the increase in care allowance. The director did not have the power to decide about the issue and suggested that Omi send an official request to the responsible authorities. Eventually, her application to be exempt from the increased fee was approved and Omi was allowed to continue to pay 4 Mark instead of 5 Mark per day.

Three years later, in 1932, the situation worsened: “As a war widow – my husband was killed as an active major on the Western Front in 1917 – I have had the surviving dependants = care fees (words illegible) to support me and my children over the years. Until October 1st of this year, I received the orphan's pension for the child who was accommodated in Niedermarsberg in consideration of her illness. Until the spring of this year, I also received the child allowance. Both sums, which together amounted to 45 marks for the month, have now been abolished. In addition, due to the emergency regulations, my pension has been reduced by around a third since the last time the daily care rate was set. I am therefore now completely unable to continue paying the previous nursing rate of 4 Mark. In view of the fact that the total cost of living has fallen considerably since the care rate of 4 Mark was set and with reference to my extraordinary emergency situation, I take the liberty of making the very humble and urgent request to reduce the care rate for my child to 3 Mark. Raising this sum will require me to make enormous sacrifices, as this sum also consumes almost half of my pension.” In the end, this request was also granted and Omi only had to pay 3 Mark per month.

Adulthood and Death

According to the “Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases”, all disabled people need to fill out a report certifying whether the person in question suffered from a hereditary disease. This was also done in Kätchen's case and she was certified with “congenital feeblemindedness.” Although this was not true, as shown by all other medical and examination reports of the sanatorium at the time she was admitted. It is not clear whether this misdiagnosis was deliberate or an oversight, but it was a factor in why Kätchen later became a victim of the Nazi “euthanasia” program.

Final Medical Record notes from St. Johannes-Stift Niedermarsberg indicate that there were no changes [in Katchen’s condition] for the rest of the year [1939] or during 1940 (“Condition unchanged”). For 1941, only one entry can be found, the last entry before she was transferred from the Marsberg Sanatorium to Weilmünster. The entry from June 10, 1941 notes the following: “About every ¼ year, the patient has seizures, enuresis, tongue biting, reduced sleep with drowsiness lasting for days, otherwise quiet and still. The patient has to be completely cared for and is occasionally unclean with urine. Occasionally agitated, she babbles confusedly. Completely incapable of any gainful activity due to … (word illegible).”

Hilla and Katchen Reichardt

The last existing photo of Kätchen (right) with her sister Hilla (Taken during a visit to Niedermarsberg - date unknown)

It is not known if this doctor’s entry determined the decision to transfer Kätchen, but the fact that she had “to be completely cared for” and was “completely incapable of any gainful activity” was an important finding as in the Nazi ideology, only people who could contribute to society had a right to live. Kätchen was transferred from Marsberg Sanatorium to Weilmünster Sanatorium on June 29, 1941.

Afterward, when going to visit Käthchen, Aunt Jenny was told that she was not in the Sanatorium anymore and had been sent to an unknown destination. The family made inquiries about Kätchen's whereabouts. On July 3, 1941, Bernhard wrote a letter to the Marsberg Sanatorium asking where Kätchen was sent. From there, his letter was forwarded to the “Gemeinnützige Krankentransport GmbH” (non-profit patient transport company) in Berlin. He later received a letter dated July 17, 1941, with the information that “Käthe Reichardt, born 8/21/1882, was transferred to the Bernburg/Saale sanatorium and nursing home” and that they had asked the Bernburg institution to get in contact with the family. However, because the Käthe Reichardt mentioned in the letter had the wrong date of birth, the family felt that it was a different individual and wrote again. About ten days later, a letter was received from Bernburg with the following information: “We regret to inform you that the patient, Miss Auguste Luise Henriette Reichardt, born August 21, 1882, in Zeitz ... died here already on December 18, 1940, from a severe epileptic seizure.” Meanwhile, according to Bernhard’s autobiography, her mother Omi had received a letter from Marsberg that her daughter had been transferred to the Herborn Sanatorium for "war-related security reasons." Furthermore, on July 10, 1941, Omi received a telegram from the Weilmünster Sanatorium that Kätchen had died the same day and that the funeral would be that next Sunday.

Omi and Aunt Jenny went to Weilmünster Sanatorium. According to Bernhard’s autobiography, “a dead woman was presented to them, who, emaciated beyond recognition, could only be recognized by her mother as her daughter Käthe by her deformed feet.” Omi herself wrote in a letter to the director of the Weilmünster Sanatorium: “It was difficult to recognize my child - she had changed so much, if only her hair had not been cut off completely.” This information fits with the official cause of death, which was “Marasmus" (a severe cause of malnutrition caused by energy deficiency). Nevertheless, Omi was told that the patient had died of pneumonia, a false statement that was given to countless relatives at the time.

Death Register Town of Weilmunster

Death Register of the town of Weilmünster
Entry 140/1941 about the death Kätchen

On Sunday, July 13, 1941, Aunt Jenny and Omi buried Kätchen in a cemetery in Weilmünster, most likely the cemetery of the Weilmünster Sanatorium, but there are no records to confirm this.

There’s also not a lot known about Kätchen’s well-being between her day of transfer, June 29, and her death on July 10. After her death, Weilmünster reported back to Marsberg and sent a note about the funeral, as well as a receipt with the funeral costs. In addition, they sent a last medical entry, which stated: “July 10, 1941: Ate badly all the time, had to be spoon-fed, declined physically. Death occurred at 0:16. Cause of death: general physical exhaustion.” On August 3,  Omi then received a note from the Weilmünster Sanatorium telling her that her daughter was transferred to another unknown sanatorium. She was shocked and outraged, and immediately wrote a letter to the director of the Weilmünster Sanatorium with the urgent question and demand to be told if her daughter was dead or still alive.

A few days later, she received an apologetic message, dated August 5, 1941, saying that she had accidentally received information about a patient with the same name who had been transferred.

Legacy

According to oral family history, in January, 1945, Hilla gave birth to her youngest daughter, Agnete, the last of four children she had with Bernhard, in addition to the three children he had from his first marriage. Her mother, Omi, took baby Agnete on as a “surrogate daughter.” She was a rather sickly child, but always driven by the urge to be active and to get outside. However, fearing that something might happen to her, Omi often would not allow her to play outside with other children or do things on her own. 

In later years, in order to come to terms with their family history and to know more about Kätchen’s fate apart from a few family stories and Bernhard's autobiography, the family started to conduct research about her. In 2024, the family sent an email to the successor of the Marsberg Sanatorium and Nursing Home and received information back that all records about former patients were kept in the central archives of the “Landschaftsverband Westfalen Lippe (LWL)”. They were very surprised when they got an email that the patient file of Kätchen still existed in the archives and that they could receive a digital copy; they received 144 pages with all different documents, among others the cited personal letters of Omi and Aunt Jenny, as well as copies of information from the director of the Marsberg Sanatorium and other authorities.

When the family contacted the Vitos Hospital Weilmünster, the successor of the Weilmünster Sanatorium and Nursing Home, they forwarded the email to the person responsible at the Hadamar Memorial, the central memorial for all “Euthanasia” murders in Hesse and received the following answer: “Mrs. Maria Katharina Reichardt, born on 12/15/1911 in Posen, was admitted to the Marsberg institution on a date unknown to us. From there, she was transferred to the Weilmünster State Sanatorium on 06/29/1941.” At this time, Weilmünster was a so-called “intermediate institution” for the Hadamar killing center. From January to August 1941, Hadamar was one of six “Euthanasia” killing centers of Aktion T4; patients from other institutions were initially collected in “intermediate institutions” and soon afterwards transferred to Hadamar and murdered.

Since 1991, a memorial stone in the cemetery of the Weilmünster institution has commemorated the victims of “Euthanasia.” Since 2003, the cemetery has been designated as a memorial to the victims and documents all known names of the deceased that are buried there. Further information on the history of Weilmünster Hospital can be found in the exhibition in House 105 and in the book by Christina Vanja (ed.): “Heilanstalt – Sanatorium – Kliniken. 100 Jahre Krankenhaus Weilmünster 1897 – 1997, Kassel 1997.”

Note: Kätchen's story was provided by a descendent of her sister and is based both on family oral history and evidence found in the historical records. The timeline surrounding her transfer, death, funeral, and related communication on her status are not linear and impact the family’s ongoing questions around Kätchen's final days. 

Discussion Questions

1. What was Kätchen’s relationship like with her family members, particularly her sister Hilla and her mother, ‘Omi’?

2. How did the loss of her father during World War I and the family's financial struggles during the Great Depression impact the family dynamic and Kätchen's care?

3. How did Kätchen's initial encephalitis and subsequent health complications shape her life and care needs?

4. What were the primary reasons her mother chose St. Johannes-Stift Niedermarsberg for her care?

5. What can be inferred about the quality of care Kätchen received based on the medical records and family correspondence?

6. How did the Nazi regime's policies, such as the "Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases," impact Kätchen and others in similar circumstances?

7. To what extent did the family's Catholic faith influence their decisions regarding Kätchen's care?

8. How significant was Aunt Jenny's support, both emotional and financial, in shaping Kätchen’s life in the institution?

9. What insights do the family’s discoveries about Kätchen’s medical records and correspondence provide about her personality and experiences?

10. How has the family's perspective on Kätchen's life and the historical context evolved through their research?

11. How do the historical records about Kätchen's misdiagnosis and eventual fate reflect the ethical challenges faced by families and medical professionals under the Nazi regime?

12. What specific details are included in the 144 pages of documents retrieved from the Marsberg Sanatorium archives?

13. Why was Kätchen transferred to Weilmünster on June 29, 1941? Was this part of the systematic movement of patients related to Aktion T4?

14. Why did the family receive conflicting information about Kätchen’s whereabouts and status from multiple institutions? Was this confusion a result of bureaucratic inefficiency, deliberate obfuscation, or a reflection of systemic chaos in the euthanasia program?

15. How do Kätchen’s experiences reflect the broader context of Nazi euthanasia programs, particularly the role of "intermediate institutions" like Weilmünster?

16. How did the loss of Kätchen shape the family’s attitudes toward authority, caregiving, and trauma management in the following generations?