Skip to content
Teaching the Holocaust and other Genocides
 
Created in collaboration with the Holocaust & Human Rights Center, the NYS Education Department, and the NYS Archives Partnership Trust.

French Apology Speeches

“Deportation of Jews from France: France Recognizes its Responsibility” 

SPEECH GIVEN BY PRESIDENT JACQUES CHIRAC ON JULY 16, 1995 (AT THE VEL D’HIV CEREMONY) 

[Translation by Eileen Angelini]:  

... the criminal madness of the Occupant was supported by the French, by the French state. France, home of the Enlightenment and the Rights of Man, land of welcome and asylum, France that day committed the irreparable. Breaking its word, it delivered those it protected to their executioners ... Seventy-four trains will leave for Auschwitz.  

Seventy-six thousand will not return. We maintain an imprescriptible debt towards them.  

… I want to remember that this summer of 1942, which reveals the true face of 'collaboration,' whose racist character after the anti-Jewish laws of 1940, is no doubt, will be for many of our compatriots, that of a start, the starting point of a vast resistance movement because there is also a righteous France, generous, faithful to its traditions, to its genius. How can we neglect the humanist values, the values of freedom, justice, tolerance which are the basis of French identity and guide us for the future. 

FRENCH CATHOLIC CHURCH APOPOGIZES FOR SILENCE DURING THE HOLOCAUST. LA “DÉCLARATION DE REPENTENCE” DE L'ÉGLISE DE FRANCE  

September 30, 1997: Archbishop Olivier de Berranger apologizes for the silence of the French Catholic Church.  

[Translation by Eileen Angelini]: 

On the eve of the anniversary of the publication, on October 3, 1940, of the First Statute of Jews, the bishops of France made public, Tuesday September 30, 1997, in Drancy this “declaration” on the attitude of the Catholic Church of France under the Vichy regime.  

A major event in the history of the twentieth century, the Nazis' attempt to exterminate the Jewish people poses formidable questions to the conscience that no human being can dismiss. The Catholic Church, far from appealing to oblivion, knows that conscience is constituted by memory and that no society, like any individual, can live in peace with itself over a repressed or false past.  

The Church of France is wondering. It is invited, like the other Churches, by Pope John Paul II, at the approach of the third millennium: It is good that the Church crosses this passage being clearly aware of what it has done. Yesterday's decline is an act of loyalty and courage which has strengthened our faith, which makes us perceive the temptations and difficulties of today and prepares us to face them ...  

… We do not have to set ourselves up as judges of people and consciences at this time, we are not ourselves guilty of what happened yesterday, but we are in solidarity with it because it is our Church and today we are obliged to observe objectively that ecclesial interests understood in an excessively restrictive manner have come before the commandments of conscience and we must ask ourselves why ...  

... On the eve of the war, Archbishop Saliège recommended that twentieth century Catholics seek light in the teaching of Pius XI rather than in such edict of Innocent III in the thirteenth century. During the war, theologians and exegetes, in Lyon and in Paris, prophetically highlighted the Jewish roots of Christianity, stressing that the stem of Jesse had flourished in Israel, that the two Testaments were inseparable, that the Virgin, Christ, the Apostles were Jews and that Christianity is linked to Judaism as the branch to the trunk which carried it. Alas, they were hardly listened to ...  

… In the judgment of historians, it is a well-attested fact that, for centuries, a tradition of anti-Judaism prevailed among the Christian people, until the Second Vatican Council, marking various levels of Christian doctrine and teaching, theology and apologetics, preaching and liturgy. On this soil, has flourished until our century. Hence the wounds that are still alive ...  

... Today we confess that this silence was a mistake. We also recognize that the Church of France then failed in its mission of educator of conscience and that thus it bears with the Christian people the responsibility of not having brought help from the first moments when the protest and the protection were possible and necessary, even if, thereafter, there were countless acts of courage.  

This is a fact that we recognize today. For this failure of the Church of France and its historic responsibility towards the Jewish people is part of itself. We confess this fault. We implore forgiveness and ask the Jewish people to hear this word of repentance.

Note: Both of these speeches are available with English subtitles in the documentary La France divisée/France Divided. 

Discussion Questions

  1. How does Chirac characterize the role of France in the Vel d’Hiv roundup and the deportation of Jews to Auschwitz? 
  2. What does Chirac mean by the phrase “France that day committed the irreparable” in his speech at the Vel d’Hiv ceremony?” 
  3. What are the key elements of the French Catholic Church’s apology as stated by Archbishop Olivier de Berranger? 
  4. How does the Church view the relationship between Christianity and Judaism, according to the speech? 
  5. Compare and contrast the tone and purpose of Chirac’s speech and the Catholic Church’s apology. What similarities and differences do you observe? 
  6. How do both speeches address the concept of responsibility and collective guilt? 
  7. How do both speeches reflect changes in public memory and attitudes toward France’s collaboration with Nazi Germany? 
  8. Discuss how both speeches balance acknowledgment of guilt with a call to uphold moral and ethical values moving forward. 
  9. How do both speeches deal with the theme of collective versus individual responsibility?